Leeds University Library

Research in Action Reading List

Research in Action, 2017/18, Semester 2
Mary Madden
Tutor information is taken from the Module Catalogue


Chalmers, I and Glasziou, P 2009. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. . 374 (9683), 86-89.

Ioannidis, J  2016. Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful. PLoS medicine. 13(6): e1002049. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049

Al-Shahi Salman, R., Beller, E., et. al. 2014. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. . 383 ,  176-85 .

Top of page

Managing Clinical Trials (including practical problems, ensuring quality and trustworthiness and social aspects)

Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P. Godlee, F. 2013 All trials must be registered and the results published British medical journal. 346 :f105

DAMOCLES Study Group 2005. A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well. Lancet. ; 365 : 711–22.

Hess C, Roe M, Gibson C et al., 2014. Independent data monitoring committees: preparing a path for the future American heart journal. . 168 (2):135-41.

Farrell, B., Kenyon, S., and Shakur, H.  2010. Managing clinical trials Trials. ; 11 : 78.

Pearce W, Raman S,Turner T. 2015 Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy. Trials. ; 16 :394

Pocock, S. 1983. Clinical trials : a practical approach . Wiley Medical Publications.

Trial Managers Network. 2014. Guide to Efficient Trial Management . 4th Edition NIHR: HMSO, January DOI: 10.3310/2014-Trial-Managers’-Network - Available online: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.tmn.ac.uk/resource/resmgr/TMN_Guide/tmn-guidelines-web_%5Bamended_.pdf

Top of page


Stevenson F. et al. 2015. Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm. BMC Medical Ethics [electronic resource]. 16 :21

Goodyear-Smith F., Jackson, C, and Greenhalgh, T. 2015 Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Medical Ethics [electronic resource]. , 16 :78

Top of page

Patient and Public Involvement

Dudley L, Gamble C, Preston J et al 2015. Young. What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials PlosOne; 10 (6): e0128817. - Available online:  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459695/

Madden M 2016. Engaging Civil Society with Health Research. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science . DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2016.0037. Available at: http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/70/4/399

Madden M, and Morley R. 2016. Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership Research Involvement and Engagement  2:12 . Available at: https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y

Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper C et al. 2014. Exploring the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in a Cancer Research Setting. Qualitative health research. ; 24 (1) 46–54

Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, et al. 2015 ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study. Health Services Delivery Research ; 3 (38). - Available at: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/50495/1/FullReport-hsdr03380.pdf

This list was last updated on 21/12/2017